Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial

Partilhar

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Claude Sonnet 5Profile

Claude Sonnet 5.5Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Claude Sonnet 5 da Anthropic é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 68/100

Intelligence Index68 / 100

Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.2%

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Claude Sonnet 5.5 da Anthropic é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 105 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 78/

Intelligence Index78 / 100

Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.9%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 1.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is faster at 105 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (82.9% vs 81.2%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Claude Sonnet 5	Claude Sonnet 5.5
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	68	78
Provider	Anthropic	Anthropic
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$3.00 / 1M	$2.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$15.00 / 1M	$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$2.31 / 1M	$1.54 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	128K	128K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	95 tok/s	105 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	81.2%	82.9%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	77.5%	79.4%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.30 / 1M	$0.20 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Claude Sonnet 5.5

+1.7% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Claude Sonnet 5.5

1.5x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Claude Sonnet 5.5

+11% faster generation

Context

Tied

1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5.5

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

81.2%vs82.9%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

77.5%vs79.4%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.2%vs90.1%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1445ptsvs1490pts

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

56.4%vs58.9%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

95 tok/s vs105 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Claude Sonnet 50.60s

Claude Sonnet 5.50.55s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Claude Sonnet 55.86s

Claude Sonnet 5.55.31s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Claude Sonnet 5 Monthly API Bill

$18.45 / month

$3/1M in · $15/1M out

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Monthly API Bill

$12.30 / month

$2/1M in · $10/1M out

Claude Sonnet 5.5 saves approximately $6.15 / month (33%) under this workload.1.5x Savings

Claude Sonnet 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 81.2% · GPQA Diamond 77.5%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 95 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 600 ms
Economia de API competitiva ($3/$15 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas

Considerations & Trade-offs

Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 82.9% · GPQA Diamond 79.4%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 105 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 550 ms
Economia de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas

Considerations & Trade-offs

Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Claude Sonnet 5	Claude Sonnet 5.5
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$3.48	$3.29
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	72K	72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	38K	37K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Claude Sonnet 5 or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 78 compared with 68 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is faster, generating 105 tokens per second compared with 95 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper at $1.54 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.31 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.55s compared with 0.60s.

Veredito

Tanto Claude Sonnet 5 (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Claude Sonnet 5.5 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Claude Sonnet 5.5 oferece geração mais rápida e Claude Sonnet 5.5 apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Claude Sonnet 5 ou Claude Sonnet 5.5?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Claude Sonnet 5.5 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Claude Sonnet 5 ou Claude Sonnet 5.5?+

O Claude Sonnet 5 custa $3.00 / $15.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Claude Sonnet 5.5 custa $2.00 / $10.00. No custo combinado, Claude Sonnet 5.5 é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Claude Sonnet 5 suporta 1M tokens de contexto contra 1M tokens do Claude Sonnet 5.5, enquanto Claude Sonnet 5.5 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Feature	Claude Sonnet 5	Claude Sonnet 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)	claude-sonnet-5-20260601	claude-sonnet-5-5-20260901
API Protocol	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date	2026-06	2026-09
Knowledge Cutoff	March 2026	June 2026
Architecture	Next-Gen 1M Multimodal Agent Engine	Adaptive Frontier Multimodal Transformer
Parameters	Confidential	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	$0.3/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL	$0.2/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Quem vence em cada categoria?

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Claude Sonnet 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificações Técnicas

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredito

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Related reading