Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Qwen 2.5 72BProfile

Qwen 2.5 32B InstructProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 72B

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Qwen 2.5 72B dari Alibaba adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 64 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 44/100, serta tarif $0.35/

Intelligence Index44 / 100

Input Token:

$0.35 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.70 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

45.2%

Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct dari Alibaba adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 131K, kecepatan 85 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 41/100, serta tar

Intelligence Index41 / 100

Input Token:

$0.18 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.36 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

40.8%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct is 1.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct is faster at 85 tok/s vs 64 tok/s.
Qwen 2.5 72B leads on SWE-bench coding (45.2% vs 40.8%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Qwen 2.5 72B	Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	44	41
Provider	Alibaba	Alibaba
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.35 / 1M	$0.18 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.70 / 1M	$0.36 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.19 / 1M	$0.10 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text	131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	8K	8K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	64 tok/s	85 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	45.2%	40.8%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	52.8%	48.5%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.07 / 1M	$0.04 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Qwen 2.5 72B

+4.4% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct

1.9x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct

+33% faster generation

Context

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct

131.1K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen 2.5 72BQwen 2.5 32B Instruct

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

45.2%vs40.8%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

52.8%vs48.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

71.4%vs67.2%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1282ptsvs1255pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

7.2%vs5.6%

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

28.1%vs26.2%

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

28.9%vs26.5%

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

46.5%vs42.1%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

59.2%vs52.3%

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

66.8%vs64%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

64 tok/s vs85 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Qwen 2.5 72B0.61s

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct0.48s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Qwen 2.5 72B8.42s

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct6.36s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Qwen 2.5 72B Monthly API Bill

$1.26 / month

$0.35/1M in · $0.7/1M out

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct Monthly API Bill

$0.65 / month

$0.18/1M in · $0.36/1M out

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct saves approximately $0.61 / month (49%) under this workload.1.9x Savings

Qwen 2.5 72B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 45.2% · GPQA Diamond 52.8%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 64 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 610 ms
Bobot terbuka (72B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 131K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 40.8% · GPQA Diamond 48.5%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 85 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 480 ms
Bobot terbuka (32B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Qwen 2.5 72B	Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.28	$0.16
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	32K	28K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	0K	0K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Qwen 2.5 72B	Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct
Official API Model ID (SDK)	qwen-2-5-72b-instruct	qwen-2-5-32b-instruct
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2024-09	2024-09
Knowledge Cutoff	September 2024	June 2024
Architecture	Dense Autoregressive Transformer	Dense Autoregressive Transformer
Parameters	72B	32B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 128K window	Flat rate ($0.18/1M in) across full 131K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.07/1M tokens	Cached input at $0.036/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 45 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 155 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text
Output Modalities	text	text

Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen 2.5 72B or Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen 2.5 72B is more intelligent. It scores 44 compared with 41 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 64 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.10 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.19 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.48s compared with 0.61s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Qwen 2.5 72B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Qwen 2.5 72B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Qwen 2.5 72B atau Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Qwen 2.5 72B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct?+

Qwen 2.5 72B mengenakan biaya $0.35 / $0.70 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct sebesar $0.18 / $0.36. Secara keseluruhan, Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Qwen 2.5 72B mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 131.1K token pada Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct, sementara Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Qwen 2.5 72B

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Qwen 2.5 72B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Spesifikasi Teknis

Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Kesimpulan

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Related reading