Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-5.1

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-5.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-5.2 Chat dari OpenAI dan GPT-5.1 dari OpenAI adalah dua model AI unggulan. GPT-5.2 Chat menawarkan jendela konteks 128K token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan GPT-5.1 menyediakan konteks 400K token seharga $1.25/$10.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Chat

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

GPT-5.2 Chat dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 135 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 63/100, serta akses

Intelligence Index63 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

75.4%

OpenAI

GPT-5.1

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

GPT-5.1 dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 400K, kecepatan 130 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 60/100, serta tarif $1.2

Intelligence Index60 / 100
Input Token:

$1.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.9%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • GPT-5.2 Chat is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-5.1 has a larger context window (400K vs 128K tokens).
  • GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 135 tok/s vs 130 tok/s.
  • GPT-5.2 Chat leads on SWE-bench coding (75.4% vs 74.9%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-5.2 ChatGPT-5.1
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6360
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$1.25 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$1.34 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
135 tok/s130 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
75.4%74.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
76.5%72.1%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.13 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-5.2 Chat
+0.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-5.2 Chat
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-5.2 Chat
+4% faster generation
Context
GPT-5.1
400K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.2 ChatGPT-5.1
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

75.4%vs74.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

76.5%vs72.1%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86.6%vs86.1%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1382ptsvs1368pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13%vs12.1%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

48.5%vs46.7%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

45%vs43.2%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs71.8%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

92.6%vs91.2%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80.5%vs77.9%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

135 tok/s vs130 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5.2 Chat1.10s
GPT-5.11.20s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5.2 Chat4.80s
GPT-5.15.05s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5.2 Chat Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
GPT-5.1 Monthly API Bill
$11.06 / month
$1.25/1M in · $10/1M out
GPT-5.2 Chat saves approximately $11.06 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GPT-5.2 Chat · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 75.4% · GPQA Diamond 76.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 135 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1100 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (akses gratis open-weights) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

GPT-5.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 400K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 74.9% · GPQA Diamond 72.1%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 130 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1200 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $1.25/$10 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5.2 ChatGPT-5.1
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$1.90$1.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
54K52K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
29K28K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-5.2 ChatGPT-5.1
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-2-chatgpt-5-1
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2025-122025-11
Knowledge CutoffAugust 2025October 2024
ArchitectureChat-tuned unified reasoning modelUnified Reasoning (Instant & Thinking)
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Flat rate ($1.25/1M in) across full 400K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Automatic prefix caching at $0.125/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function callingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-5.1: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.2 Chat or GPT-5.1?

GPT-5.2 Chat is more intelligent. It scores 63 compared with 60 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5.2 Chat is faster, generating 135 tokens per second compared with 130 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-5.2 Chat is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.34 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-5.2 Chat has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.10s compared with 1.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-5.1 has a larger context window, supporting 400K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik GPT-5.2 Chat (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun GPT-5.1 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: GPT-5.2 Chat unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, GPT-5.2 Chat memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan GPT-5.2 Chat lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, GPT-5.2 Chat atau GPT-5.1?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, GPT-5.2 Chat memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-5.1?+

GPT-5.2 Chat mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan GPT-5.1 sebesar $1.25 / $10.00. Secara keseluruhan, GPT-5.2 Chat lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

GPT-5.2 Chat mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 400K token pada GPT-5.1, sementara GPT-5.2 Chat unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi OpenAI & OpenAI serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).