Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.1 Codex vs Devstral 2

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5.1 Codex vs Devstral 2: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-5.1 Codex dari OpenAI dan Devstral 2 dari Mistral AI adalah dua model AI unggulan. GPT-5.1 Codex menawarkan jendela konteks 400K token dengan harga $1.25/$10.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Devstral 2 menyediakan konteks 262.1K token seharga $1.50/$4.50 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

GPT-5.1 Codex dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 400K, kecepatan 125 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 61/100, serta tari

Intelligence Index61 / 100
Input Token:

$1.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.1%

Mistral AI

Devstral 2

Model Agen Otonom & Alat

Devstral 2 dari Mistral AI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 262K, kecepatan 70 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 56/100, s

Intelligence Index56 / 100
Input Token:

$1.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$4.50 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

58.2%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Devstral 2 is 1.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-5.1 Codex has a larger context window (400K vs 262K tokens).
  • GPT-5.1 Codex is faster at 125 tok/s vs 70 tok/s.
  • GPT-5.1 Codex leads on SWE-bench coding (76.1% vs 58.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-5.1 CodexDevstral 2
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6156
Provider
OpenAIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.25 / 1M$1.50 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$4.50 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.34 / 1M$0.99 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K66K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
125 tok/s70 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
76.1%58.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
78.5%66.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.13 / 1M$0.35 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-5.1 Codex
+17.9% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Devstral 2
1.6x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-5.1 Codex
+79% faster generation
Context
GPT-5.1 Codex
400K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.1 CodexDevstral 2
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

76.1%vs58.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.5%vs66.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86.5%vs83.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1372ptsvs1365pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

12.6%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

52%vs52%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

46.5%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

74%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

91.8%vs78%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

78.5%vs82%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

125 tok/s vs70 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5.1 Codex1.20s
Devstral 20.52s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5.1 Codex5.20s
Devstral 27.66s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5.1 Codex Monthly API Bill
$11.06 / month
$1.25/1M in · $10/1M out
Devstral 2 Monthly API Bill
$6.82 / month
$1.5/1M in · $4.5/1M out
Devstral 2 saves approximately $4.24 / month (38%) under this workload.1.6x Savings

GPT-5.1 Codex · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 400K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 76.1% · GPQA Diamond 78.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 125 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1200 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $1.25/$10 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Devstral 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 262K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 58.2% · GPQA Diamond 66.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 70 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 520 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (123B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5.1 CodexDevstral 2
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$1.65$0.65
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
58K42K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
33K20K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-5.1 CodexDevstral 2
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-1-codexdevstral-2-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-112025-12
Knowledge CutoffOctober 2024October 2025
ArchitectureCode-specialised unified reasoning modelAdvanced Agentic Code Transformer
ParametersConfidential123B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.25/1M in) across full 400K windowFlat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 262K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.125/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Cached input at $0.35/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 76 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 264 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5.1 Codex vs Devstral 2: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.1 Codex or Devstral 2?

GPT-5.1 Codex is more intelligent. It scores 61 compared with 56 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5.1 Codex is faster, generating 125 tokens per second compared with 70 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Devstral 2 is cheaper at $0.99 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.34 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Devstral 2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.52s compared with 1.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-5.1 Codex has a larger context window, supporting 400K tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik GPT-5.1 Codex (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Devstral 2 (Sangat cocok untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: GPT-5.1 Codex unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, GPT-5.1 Codex memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Devstral 2 lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, GPT-5.1 Codex atau Devstral 2?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, GPT-5.1 Codex memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API GPT-5.1 Codex vs Devstral 2?+

GPT-5.1 Codex mengenakan biaya $1.25 / $10.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Devstral 2 sebesar $1.50 / $4.50. Secara keseluruhan, Devstral 2 lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

GPT-5.1 Codex mendukung konteks 400K token dibandingkan 262.1K token pada Devstral 2, sementara GPT-5.1 Codex unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi OpenAI & Mistral AI serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).