Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 3.3 70B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 3.3 70B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Gemma 4 31B dari Google dan Llama 3.3 70B dari Meta adalah dua model AI unggulan. Gemma 4 31B menawarkan jendela konteks 262.1K token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Llama 3.3 70B menyediakan konteks 128K token seharga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemma 4 31B

Penalaran Bobot Terbuka

Gemma 4 31B dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran rantai pemikiran (Chain-of-Thought) berbobot terbuka yang sangat efisien, menghadirkan jendela konteks 262K, kecepatan 80 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 81/100, serta ak

Intelligence Index81 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

68.5%

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Llama 3.3 70B dari Meta adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 280 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 38/100, serta akses gratis

Intelligence Index38 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

39.5%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Gemma 4 31B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window (262K vs 128K tokens).
  • Llama 3.3 70B is faster at 280 tok/s vs 80 tok/s.
  • Gemma 4 31B leads on SWE-bench coding (68.5% vs 39.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemma 4 31BLlama 3.3 70B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8138
Provider
GoogleMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$0.07 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
33K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
80 tok/s280 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
68.5%39.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
77%48.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemma 4 31B
+29.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemma 4 31B
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B
+250% faster generation
Context
Gemma 4 31B
262.1K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemma 4 31BLlama 3.3 70B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

68.5%vs39.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

77%vs48.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

84.8%vs71%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1410ptsvs1285pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs7.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs26.1%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs23.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs42.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

86%vs56.2%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs63.9%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

80 tok/s vs280 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemma 4 31B0.48s
Llama 3.3 70B0.25s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemma 4 31B6.73s
Llama 3.3 70B2.04s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemma 4 31B Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Llama 3.3 70B Monthly API Bill
$0.15 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Gemma 4 31B saves approximately $0.15 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Gemma 4 31B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 262K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 33K token (SWE-bench Verified 68.5% · GPQA Diamond 77%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 80 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 480 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (31B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Llama 3.3 70B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (SWE-bench Verified 39.5% · GPQA Diamond 48.9%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 280 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 250 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (70B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemma 4 31BLlama 3.3 70B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$0.21
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
12K45K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
6K0K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemma 4 31BLlama 3.3 70B
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemma-4-31bmeta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-042024-12
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026December 2023
ArchitectureDense open reasoning transformer with native thinkingDense Autoregressive Transformer
Parameters31B70B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 67 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 3.3 70B: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemma 4 31B or Llama 3.3 70B?

Gemma 4 31B is more intelligent. It scores 81 compared with 38 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 3.3 70B is faster, generating 280 tokens per second compared with 80 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.07 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3.3 70B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.25s compared with 0.48s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Gemma 4 31B (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran rantai pemikiran (Chain-of-Thought) berbobot terbuka yang sangat efisien, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Llama 3.3 70B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Gemma 4 31B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Llama 3.3 70B memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Gemma 4 31B lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Gemma 4 31B atau Llama 3.3 70B?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Gemma 4 31B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 3.3 70B?+

Gemma 4 31B mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Llama 3.3 70B sebesar $0.00 / $0.00. Secara keseluruhan, Gemma 4 31B lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Gemma 4 31B mendukung konteks 262.1K token dibandingkan 128K token pada Llama 3.3 70B, sementara Llama 3.3 70B unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Google & Meta serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).