Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash dari Google dan Gemini 3 Pro dari Google adalah dua model AI unggulan. Gemini 3 Flash menawarkan jendela konteks 1.05M token dengan harga $0.50/$3.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Gemini 3 Pro menyediakan konteks 2M token seharga $2.00/$12.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 3 Flash

Inferensi Super Cepat

Gemini 3 Flash dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk interaksi real-time dengan latensi sangat rendah dan routing bervolume tinggi, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1.0M, kecepatan 180 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 75/100, serta tar

Intelligence Index75 / 100
Input Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

66.5%

Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

Gemini 3 Pro dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 2M, kecepatan 118 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 62/100, serta tarif $

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$12.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.2%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Gemini 3 Flash is 3.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 3 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 3 Flash is faster at 180 tok/s vs 118 tok/s.
  • Gemini 3 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (76.2% vs 66.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7562
Provider
GoogleGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.50 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$3.00 / 1M$12.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.49 / 1M$1.74 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K66K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
180 tok/s118 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
66.5%76.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
79%73.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.13 / 1M$0.20 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 3 Pro
+9.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 3 Flash
3.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 3 Flash
+53% faster generation
Context
Gemini 3 Pro
2M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

66.5%vs76.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

79%vs73.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

85.8%vs86.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1425ptsvs1384pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs12.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs47.9%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs44.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

88%vs92.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs84.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

180 tok/s vs118 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 3 Flash0.40s
Gemini 3 Pro1.80s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 3 Flash3.18s
Gemini 3 Pro6.04s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 3 Flash Monthly API Bill
$3.64 / month
$0.5/1M in · $3/1M out
Gemini 3 Pro Monthly API Bill
$14.10 / month
$2/1M in · $12/1M out
Gemini 3 Flash saves approximately $10.46 / month (74%) under this workload.3.9x Savings

Gemini 3 Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1.0M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 66.5% · GPQA Diamond 79%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 180 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 400 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $0.5/$3 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Gemini 3 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 2M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 76.2% · GPQA Diamond 73.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 118 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1800 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $2/$12 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.95$2.40
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K60K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
16K31K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-3-flashmodels/gemini-3-pro
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2025-122025-11
Knowledge CutoffSeptember 2025January 2025
ArchitectureNext-gen sparse multimodal mixture-of-expertsSparse Multimodal MoE
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.125/1M with configurable TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.2/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3 Pro?

Gemini 3 Flash is more intelligent. It scores 75 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3 Flash is faster, generating 180 tokens per second compared with 118 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper at $0.49 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.74 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 3 Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.40s compared with 1.80s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 1.05M tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Gemini 3 Flash (Sangat cocok untuk interaksi real-time dengan latensi sangat rendah dan routing bervolume tinggi, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Gemini 3 Pro (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Gemini 3 Flash unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Gemini 3 Flash memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Gemini 3 Flash lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Gemini 3 Flash atau Gemini 3 Pro?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Gemini 3 Flash memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro?+

Gemini 3 Flash mengenakan biaya $0.50 / $3.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Gemini 3 Pro sebesar $2.00 / $12.00. Secara keseluruhan, Gemini 3 Flash lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Gemini 3 Flash mendukung konteks 1.05M token dibandingkan 2M token pada Gemini 3 Pro, sementara Gemini 3 Flash unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Google & Google serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).