Command R7B vs Aya Expanse 32B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Command R7B dari Cohere dan Aya Expanse 32B dari Cohere adalah dua model AI unggulan. Command R7B menawarkan jendela konteks 128K token dengan harga $0.07/$0.20 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Aya Expanse 32B menyediakan konteks 128K token seharga $0.25/$0.50 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Command R7B
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaCommand R7B dari Cohere adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 140 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 38/100, serta tarif $0.07/$
$0.07 / 1M
$0.20 / 1M
128K tokens
27%
Aya Expanse 32B
Model Multibahasa GlobalAya Expanse 32B dari Cohere adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penerjemahan multibahasa yang akurat dan komunikasi perusahaan global, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 85 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 44/100, serta tarif $0.25
$0.25 / 1M
$0.50 / 1M
128K tokens
33.5%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Command R7B is 2.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Command R7B is faster at 140 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
- Aya Expanse 32B leads on SWE-bench coding (33.5% vs 27.0%).
| Feature | Command R7B | Aya Expanse 32B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 38 | 44 |
Provider | Cohere | Cohere |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.07 / 1M | $0.25 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.20 / 1M | $0.50 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.05 / 1M | $0.14 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 140 tok/s | 85 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 27% | 33.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 42.5% | 50% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.02 / 1M | $0.06 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkSkor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Command R7B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (SWE-bench Verified 27% · GPQA Diamond 42.5%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 140 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 290 ms
- Bobot terbuka (7B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Aya Expanse 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 33.5% · GPQA Diamond 50%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 85 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 440 ms
- Bobot terbuka (32B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Command R7B | Aya Expanse 32B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.05 | $0.18 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 20K | 28K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Command R7B | Aya Expanse 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | command-r7b | aya-expanse-32b |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2024-12 | 2024-10 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | October 2024 | August 2024 |
| Architecture | Efficient Compact RAG Transformer | High-Capacity Multilingual Transformer |
| Parameters | 7B | 32B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.07/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.02/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.06/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 4 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 15 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Command R7B vs Aya Expanse 32B: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Command R7B or Aya Expanse 32B?
Aya Expanse 32B is more intelligent. It scores 44 compared with 38 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Command R7B is faster, generating 140 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Command R7B is cheaper at $0.05 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.14 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Command R7B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.29s compared with 0.44s.
Kesimpulan
Baik Command R7B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Aya Expanse 32B (Sangat cocok untuk penerjemahan multibahasa yang akurat dan komunikasi perusahaan global, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Aya Expanse 32B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Command R7B memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Command R7B lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Command R7B atau Aya Expanse 32B?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Aya Expanse 32B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Command R7B vs Aya Expanse 32B?+
Command R7B mengenakan biaya $0.07 / $0.20 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Aya Expanse 32B sebesar $0.25 / $0.50. Secara keseluruhan, Command R7B lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Command R7B mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 128K token pada Aya Expanse 32B, sementara Command R7B unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Command R7B Arabic vs Command R7B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Command R7B vs Llama 3.3 70B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Falcon 3 180B vs Command R7B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Pixtral Large vs Aya Expanse 32B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Cohere & Cohere serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).