GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Command A Plus vs Command A

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Command A Plus vs Command A: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Command A Plus dari Cohere dan Command A dari Cohere adalah dua model AI unggulan. Command A Plus menawarkan jendela konteks 128K token dengan harga $3.00/$12.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Command A menyediakan konteks 256K token seharga $2.50/$10.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Cohere

Command A Plus

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Command A Plus dari Cohere adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 68 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 58/100, serta tarif $3/$1

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$12.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

60.5%

Cohere

Command A

Model Agen Otonom & Alat

Command A dari Cohere adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 256K, kecepatan 70 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 51/100, serta

Intelligence Index51 / 100
Input Token:

$2.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

46%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Command A is 1.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Command A has a larger context window (256K vs 128K tokens).
  • Command A is faster at 70 tok/s vs 68 tok/s.
  • Command A Plus leads on SWE-bench coding (60.5% vs 46.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureCommand A PlusCommand A
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5851
Provider
CohereCohere
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$3.00 / 1M$2.50 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$12.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$2.33 / 1M$2.02 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
33K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
68 tok/s70 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
60.5%46%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
74%61%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.75 / 1M$0.75 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Command A Plus
+14.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Command A
1.2x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Command A
+3% faster generation
Context
Command A
256K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Command A PlusCommand A
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

60.5%vs46%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

74%vs61%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86.8%vs81%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1410ptsvs1335pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

50%vs42%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

82.5%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

88%vs84%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

68 tok/s vs70 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Command A Plus0.56s
Command A0.52s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Command A Plus7.91s
Command A7.66s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Command A Plus Monthly API Bill
$16.43 / month
$3/1M in · $12/1M out
Command A Monthly API Bill
$13.88 / month
$2.5/1M in · $10/1M out
Command A saves approximately $2.55 / month (16%) under this workload.1.2x Savings

Command A Plus · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 33K token (SWE-bench Verified 60.5% · GPQA Diamond 74%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 68 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 560 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (Confidential (~180B+ MoE)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Command A · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 256K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 46% · GPQA Diamond 61%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 70 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 520 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (Confidential (~100B+)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricCommand A PlusCommand A
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.85$0.75
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
45K38K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
22K0K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureCommand A PlusCommand A
Official API Model ID (SDK)command-a-pluscommand-a
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-052025-03
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2026January 2025
ArchitectureFlagship Multimodal Agentic MoEAgentic Enterprise Transformer
ParametersConfidential (~180B+ MoE)Confidential (~100B+)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($3/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 256K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.75/1M tokensCached input at $0.75/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 112 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 387 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 62 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 215 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Command A Plus vs Command A: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Command A Plus or Command A?

Command A Plus is more intelligent. It scores 58 compared with 51 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Command A is faster, generating 70 tokens per second compared with 68 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Command A is cheaper at $2.02 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.33 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Command A has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.52s compared with 0.56s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Command A has a larger context window, supporting 256K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Command A Plus (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Command A (Sangat cocok untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Command A Plus unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Command A memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Command A lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Command A Plus atau Command A?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Command A Plus memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Command A Plus vs Command A?+

Command A Plus mengenakan biaya $3.00 / $12.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Command A sebesar $2.50 / $10.00. Secara keseluruhan, Command A lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Command A Plus mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 256K token pada Command A, sementara Command A unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Cohere & Cohere serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).